What if the story of a jar of desi cow ghee began almost 90 years before the jar itself existed?
Before Madhuramrat ghee reached a kitchen shelf, there was a much simpler question in Vrindavan: where would the cows go to graze?
That question eventually became the beginning of a much larger story, one involving grazing land, indigenous cattle, farmers, scientific breeding, traditional ghee and the attempt to make cow rearing economically sustainable.
It started with land
Historical accounts associated with Hasanand Gochar Bhumi trace the story back to Sant Hasanand Ji and Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Ji. At the time, cows and their owners in Vrindavan reportedly faced difficulties finding safe grazing spaces, including the burden of a grazing tax known as 'Puchhi'. Sant Hasanand Ji is said to have approached Malaviya Ji over the issue.
The land story then developed over several years, with different historical records referring to different milestones.
|
Year / Period |
What happened |
|
Late 1920s |
Historical accounts connect Malaviya Ji with efforts to secure around 1,000 acres of grazing land between Mathura and Vrindavan. |
|
1935 |
Hasanand Gochar Bhumi Trust is associated with its formal establishment. |
|
1936 |
An account says Sant Hasanand Ji purchased 106 acres in Vrindavan for safe grazing. |
|
1936–1939 |
Government records refer to around 1,005.24 acres purchased in Dhaurera Bangar and Dhaurera Khadar, Mathura. |
|
1952 |
After the Zamindari Abolition Act, government records say only 38 acres remained with the trust while the rest vested in the Gram Sabha. |
|
1962 |
A 660.85-acre lease was granted to the trust for 20 years. |
|
1973 |
The lease was cancelled. |
|
2021 |
A later report referred to around 50 acres remaining from the historic land associated with the initiative. |
The numbers changed. The circumstances changed. But the purpose remained closely tied to the protection and care of indigenous cattle.
And eventually, another question became just as important: Who would keep the cow?
When keeping a desi cow became harder
For generations, the desi cow was part of everyday rural life. Milk went into the household, calves stayed with the herd, bullocks helped with farming, and cow dung returned to the soil. The cow was not treated as a single-product animal. She was part of a larger rural cycle.
Then India's dairy system began changing. The White Revolution brought a major push towards increasing milk production, including the use of crossbreeding with exotic cattle. This with time became a concern for the long-term survival of indigenous breeds, which included challenges reported in some crossbred populations involving reproduction, disease susceptibility and climate adaptability. This became another mission for Hasanand to conquer.
Also important to note is that for a farmer, cow rearing has to make economic sense. A farmer may have affection for a cow, but affection alone cannot pay for fodder, veterinary care and everyday maintenance.
That is why one line from the Hasanand philosophy captures the problem so simply:
'A hungry farmer cannot serve a cow.'
The question was no longer only how to conserve the desi cow.
It was how to make keeping the desi cow worthwhile again.
From gaushala to a complete system
Instead of functioning only as a shelter, the Hasanand initiative developed around breeding, nutrition, animal health and milk production. The operation is described as a Scientific Breeding & Development Centre, with separate focus on nutrition, milking management, health and selective breeding.
The indigenous breeds associated with the herd include Gir, Sahiwal, Rathi, Tharparkar and Haryana/Hariana.
The current Madhuramrat information says crossbreeding is not permitted, while animal records are maintained for health, breeding and milk performance. Fodder is another important part of the system.
Veterinary care includes vaccination, deworming and preventive health management. Selective breeding is carried out using selected bulls and artificial insemination where required.
While the exact herd composition changed over time, the larger idea remained consistent: conservation needs a working system, not just a shelter.
And a working system needs income.
Read More: Scientific Breeding in Desi Cows: How Hasanand Protects Indigenous Breeds
Then came ghee
This is where the story of Hasanand begins connecting directly with Madhuramrat.
If indigenous cattle are going to remain economically viable, the products obtained from them need to create value. Ghee became one important part of that model.
The ghee journey began in 2015–16 with just 5 litres. From there, the operation has only grown, with the purpose always being bigger than the quantity.
The long way from milk to ghee
Madhuramrat's story also comes down to how the ghee is made.
Instead of taking a shortcut from milk to finished product, the Bilona-style process follows a longer route:
Milk → Curd → Butter → Ghee
The supplied process describes milk being tested for purity, fermented for around three days, churned into butter and then slowly heated to make ghee.
Today, Madhuramrat says its milk comes from its own documented indigenous herd, with no external milk procurement.
That detail matters because it connects the jar back to the larger Hasanand system: the cattle, their care, the fodder, the milk and finally the ghee.
What does 'purity' look like on paper?
For one supplied laboratory report, Batch No. 00166, manufactured by Hasanand Panchgavya Pvt. Ltd., Mathura, recorded:
|
Parameter |
Reported result |
Requirement |
|
Milk fat |
99.84% |
Minimum 99.5% |
|
Moisture |
0.16% |
Maximum 0.5% |
The report was associated with AGSS Analytical and Research Lab, described in the supplied material as FSSAI-recognised and ISO/IEC 17025 accredited.
So when someone sees a jar of pure cow ghee, there is a much longer chain behind it than the label suggests.
Cow → Breed → Fodder → Care → Milk → Curd → Butter → Ghee
That is the real chain behind the product.
Our Promise Of Purity: What’s in Madhuramrat Ghee? We Asked a Lab
But ghee was never the final destination
The larger vision goes beyond selling more ghee. This describes a long-term plan to take indigenous cows back into rural households across Braj. That includes outreach across villages, providing purebred indigenous heifers or bachhiya to farmers and developing regional channels for pure desi cow milk.
The thinking is simple: a gaushala can protect cattle, but long-term conservation also needs farmers who can keep indigenous cows as part of a viable rural economy.
Government records have also documented a Hasanand project focused on the self-sustainable development of 100 villages in Mathura using indigenous cattle and organic farming. Separately, a reported Mahamana Gau Gram plan involved 108 villages and around 2,000 cows.
The wider Panchagavya approach includes milk, curd, ghee, gaumutra and gomaye, with cow dung and cow urine described in the supplied material as inputs for natural farming and agricultural preparations.
From a grazing ground to Madhuramrat
Look at the story backwards and the connection becomes clearer.
A grazing problem led to a land initiative.
The land initiative became a gaushala.
The gaushala developed into a system around indigenous cattle.
The system needed economic sustainability.
Ghee became one way to create that value.
And that journey eventually became part of Madhuramrat.